Productized service
Your design system, audited.
Still handing off Figma files to engineering and watching the output drift? A design system audit gives you a clear picture of where things stand and a plan to fix what's broken.
The problem
Design systems start strong and decay slowly. Tokens drift from their source. Components get forked instead of extended. Engineering builds their own variants because the documented ones don't match what's in Figma. New team members copy patterns from the wrong screens. Nobody knows which version of the button is canonical.
The result: inconsistent user experience, slower development, more QA tickets, and a growing gap between what design intends and what ships.
What we review
Token architecture
Color, typography, spacing, and elevation tokens. Are they defined once and referenced everywhere, or scattered across files?
Component consistency
Are components in Figma the same as what's in code? Where have variants diverged? Which components have undocumented overrides?
Engineering handoff
Can a developer pick up a design file and build from it without guessing? Are specs complete? Are edge states documented?
Scalability
Can your system support new features, new platforms, or new brand updates without a rewrite? Where are the structural weak points?
Accessibility compliance
Do tokens and components meet WCAG AA contrast requirements? Are interactive elements properly labeled?
What you get
A structured document with findings, severity ratings, and a prioritized remediation plan. Not a 100-slide deck. A practical guide your team can execute on immediately, organized by impact and effort.
We've built and maintained design systems for enterprise platforms serving 300+ clients (Deem), custom gear configurators (Nike), and multi-platform wellness platforms (Gritwell). We know what good looks like because we've built it and maintained it at scale.